Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think most people agree that we need a config file. I haven't seen
any comments on my config file patch though.
So, any comments on that patch? Any requirements on a format?
1. Any option should be settable either in the config file or command
Lonnie Mendez wrote:
On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 23:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I said "I think" because I wanted to use a decent benchmark to
actually test the results. I threw in a test against VMPlayer as well. I
found that with USB tablet emulation, Qemu was approximately only ha
Paul Brook wrote:
If you're using an accelerator (eg. kqemu or kvm) this is all irelevant
as most code isn't run by qemu, it's virtualized by the accelerator. qemu
just does the IO emulation.
Paul
OK, so mmap is not the way to increase some speed. What needs to be
done to provide a high
Paul Brook wrote:
Does anyone know the reason for the removal of the mmap()? I have used
a benchmarking tool (I think it was 3D Mark05 or 3D Mark06) and the
memory access in the guest WinXP was slooow. Does anyone have any
insight on making the hardware MMU function for linux-x86 host to Wi
Tim Olson wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Joseph Miller wrote:
Can someone elaborate on this a little? What is the difference
between the SOFTMMU and the mmap()? Should I be using the
--enable-system or the --disable-system for win32 guest on i386
debian host? Can someone give a
Tim Olson wrote:
I am using qemu 0.8.2 built from source. In the qemu technical
documentation for features under full system emulation, it says:
"QEMU can either use a full software MMU for maximum portability or
use the host system call mmap() to simulate the target MMU."
However, I cannot
According to the roadmap,
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/roadmap.html, Mac OS X will be
supported as a guest OS. May I ask, what is the status of this?
-Joseph
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/lis
According to the roadmap,
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/roadmap.html, Mac OS X will be
supported as a guest OS. May I ask, what is the status of this?
-Joseph
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/l
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 11:00 am, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > From: "Hetz Ben Hamo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Due to some personal problems (related to financial situations) I'm
> > no
> > longer being able to keep paying the server which hosts the QEMU
> > forum.
> >
> > Therefore, I'm lookin
I'm running a terminal server under qemu with kqemu compiled into my kernel
under the -kernel-kqemu for fastest performance. What is the most efficient
method of -net ? I was using -net user with OpenVPN to connect to my
internal LAN, but I have switched to -net tap to see if that is faster.
earched it yet. Do you know why it
> can boot quickly? Have you used a distro hat was made from LFS?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> On 9/5/06, Joseph Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you are looking for a system to boot quickly, LinuxFromScratch would
> &g
If you are looking for a system to boot quickly, LinuxFromScratch would be
pretty fast, but takes a long time to build.
-Joseph
On Saturday 02 September 2006 4:43 pm, Michael Fisher wrote:
> I want to know if the following idea is impossible, possible or just crazy.
>
> I want to create a di
largefiles for some time now, but I don't know what the holdup is
on MinGW.
- -Joseph Miller
On Monday 12 June 2006 3:33 pm, Christian MICHON wrote:
> interestingly enough, qemu-img is compiled with large file support, yet
> on win32/mingw (gcc 3.4.5) qemu-img cannot manage ima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With all due respect, Tino Seifert, I must comment on your USB patch. I do
not normally post to this list, but I follow it very closely as the project
is of great interest to me. I must admit that I have rarely even looked at
qemu code, and that I
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 4:29 pm, Jonathan Kalbfeld wrote:
> I have an instance of NetBSD 3.0.1 that runs inside of QEMU emulating an
> i386.
>
> On the parent system, whether it is Windows, Linux, Solaris, or *BSD,
> you can run an OpenVPN instance and set up a tunnel.
>
> On the guest system, yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 22 January 2006 8:18 am, Andrew Leach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to QEMU but have been sufficiently impressed (well done to all
> involved) to try and get my networking working!
>
> I've installed the OpenVPN Tap driver (and called it QEMU) and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 08 January 2006 9:43 am, Paolo Campegiani wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I've tried to compile qemu (version 0.8.0 from website and pulled from CVS)
> over a Fedora Core 4 on a X86_64. In both cases, I ran these commands:
>
> configure --cc=gcc32 -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 January 2006 6:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using Version 0.7.2 under Win2000 and the network is working fine with
> the parameter: -tap "my-tap"
> Now I tried using 0.8.0, but the parameter:
> -net nic -net tap
> does not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have been using an compiler-optimized version of qemu for several weeks now
on an x86 with much success. Qemu has not crashed one single time and I have
seen a noticeable performance increase. What I have done is added
"-finline-functions -funro
19 matches
Mail list logo
