Applied on stable branch.
2008/1/13, Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
> Module name:qemu
> Changes by: Andrzej Zaborowski 08/01/14 02:56:53
>
> Modified files:
> . : qemu-doc.texi vl.c
>
> Log message:
> Change -drive
Applied on stable branch.
2008/1/14, Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
> Module name:qemu
> Changes by: Andrzej Zaborowski 08/01/14 03:48:37
>
> Modified files:
> . : block-vmdk.c
>
> Log message:
> Add a path length c
Applied on stable branch.
2008/1/13, Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
> Module name:qemu
> Changes by: Andrzej Zaborowski 08/01/14 01:52:52
>
> Modified files:
> hw : vmware_vga.c
>
> Log message:
> Register io ports a
> So, Lauros, seems like all the commits since 0.9.1 (including the two new
> ones, "Fix typo which broke MIPS32R2 64-bit FPU support" and "qemu
> manpage: describe arguments of usbdevice option, by Aurelien Jarno") are
> candidates for the stable branch...
applied.
Lauro
I've set up an experimental bug track for Qemu stable branch. If the
community wants it can be used for qemu head too.
If the community agrees, I will do the configuration to send an email
to qemu mailing list when a bug is opened.
Let me know if someone (especially the developers that have write
I think these patches are important bugfixes and they should be
applied on the qemu head.
They fix some LTP tests.
Lauro
2007/12/11, Thayne Harbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The EFAULT changes use a result of NULL to detect a failure from lock*()
> functions. There are syscalls that accept NULL as
As discussed yesterday in the qemu irc channel, I've created a stable
branch for qemu 0.9.1. This branch will follow two basic rules:
1. Only fixes will be applied.
2. Patches will be applied only after they are applied on qemu head.
The repository is
http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/qemu_0_9_1_stable.gi
d
eventually a bug track) . In 2008, I will work full time on qemu and I
will need a stable version.
Lauro Ramos Venancio
OpenBossa Labs - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
Recife - Brazil
The attached patch fixes a bug in getgroups and getgroups32 syscalls.
The current implementation returns error when size=0.
According the manual:
" If size is zero, list is not modified, but the total number of
supplementary group IDs for the process is returned."
--
Lauro Ramo
TLS patch is yours and it has never been applied.
I think this project contributes to QEMU as it groups and updates the
patches, making easier to test and apply them to the mainstream.
This project will be dead in the near future when these patches are
available in the mainstream QEMU.
--
La
rsion of
QEMU.
For more details:
http://qemu-arm-eabi.sf.net/.
The current QEMU-ARM-EABI version was synchronized last wednesday with
QEMU CVS and it's working well. It was tested with Maemo/Scratchbox
and Mamona.
Contributions are welcome.
--
Lauro Ramos Venancio
OpenBossa Labs - Institut
1 mask 20(IN_OPEN)
Event on 1 mask 1(IN_ACCESS)
Event on 1 mask 10(IN_CLOSE_NOWRITE)
$ chmod a+rwx file
Event on 1 mask 4(IN_ATTRIB)
Lauro Ramos Venancio
OpenBossa Labs
Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
Recife - Brazil
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
void prin
n download the code using "svn co
http://dev.openbossa.org/svn/mamona/qemu-omap/trunk";.
To browse the source, go to
http://dev.openbossa.org/trac/mamona/browser/qemu-omap/trunk
Contributions are welcome.
In few days, I will make a more complete announce.
Lauro Ramos Venancio
Open
The attached patch fixes a bug in execution of "blx lr".
Current behavior:
lr <- pc
branch lr
Expected behavior:
temp <- lr
lr <- pc
branch temp
Lauro
Index: target-arm/translate.c
===
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/target-arm/tran
I'm sending a new version of the patch that uses Base Restored data
abort model.
Lauro
diff -ru qemu-0.9.0.orig/target-arm/translate.c qemu-0.9.0/target-arm/translate.c
--- qemu-0.9.0.orig/target-arm/translate.c 2007-03-16 11:41:28.0 -0300
+++ qemu-0.9.0/target-arm/translate.c 2007-03-16 1
Now sending the attachment. :)
Lauro
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 16:35 -0300, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote:
> Qemu-arm is wrongly executing post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are
> the same register. For example:
>
> ldr r0, [r1], +r0
>
> Current behavior:
> r0 <- [r1]
>
Qemu-arm is wrongly executing post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are
the same register. For example:
ldr r0, [r1], +r0
Current behavior:
r0 <- [r1]
r1 <- r1 + r0
Expected behavior:
addr <- r1
r1 <- r1 + r0
r0 <- [addr]
The attached patch fixes this bug. Patched by me and Rodrigo Vivi.
This patch
17 matches
Mail list logo
