Le 2 Novembre 2005 04:15, Jérôme Warnier a écrit :
>
> Could you report on what OS and what architecture you are trying to
> build it?
> Further, we could need more information.
ya no problem
i try to build under linux (suse 10) with an athlon xp (i386)
hi
when i build qemu 0.7.2 i get:
qemu-0.7.2/softmmu_header.h:188: error: can't find a register in class
‘GENERAL_REGS’ while reloading ‘asm’
any idea?
thanks
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailm
hi
when i compile qemu 0.7.2 i get:
qemu-0.7.2/softmmu_header.h:188: error: can't find a register in class
‘GENERAL_REGS’ while reloading ‘asm’
any idea?
thanks
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/m
Le 8 Mai 2005 18:40, Struan Bartlett a écrit :
> Marc Collin wrote:
> >Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, André Braga a écrit :
> >>Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
> >
> >0 means kqemu is ok?
>
> I don't think so. The wa
Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, André Braga a écrit :
> Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
>
0 means kqemu is ok?
--
www.laboiteaprog.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/lis
hi
i do:
modprobe kqemu
with /sbin/lsmod | grep kqemu
kqemu 43272 0
does kqemu run corretely?
l'm not suppose to get 2?
thanks
--
www.laboiteaprog.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mail
hi
somebody know when the problem (protection error) to use kqemu with qemu and
win9x will be removed?
thanks
--
www.laboiteaprog.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Le 1 Mai 2005 06:31, Paul Brook a écrit :
> On Sunday 01 May 2005 05:58, Marc Collin wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > when we do a ./configure for qemu
> >
> > there is:
> >
> > target list i386-user arm-user armeb-user sparc-user ppc-user
> > i3
hi
when we do a ./configure for qemu
there is:
target list i386-user arm-user armeb-user sparc-user ppc-user
i386-softmmu ppc-softmmu sparc-softmmu x86_64-softmmu
for a x86 machine, what is the best for performance?
i386-user or i386-softmmu
thanks
--
www.laboiteaprog.com
__