Re: [Qemu-devel] CVS build error

2008-03-14 Thread Philip Boulain
? -- | Philip Boulain PhD student | #!bash | After all, dumbing down | | IAM, ECS, Uni of Southampton | :(){:| | Xanadu sure worked well for | | http://zepler.net/~lionsphil | :};:# | Tim Berners-Lee!-Ted Nelson |

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] OpenGL for OS X

2008-02-06 Thread Philip Boulain
On 6 Feb 2008, at 06:00, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: 2008/2/5, Fabrice Bellard [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is an SDL related issue (i.e. SDL may or may not use OpenGL to display graphics). Fixing SDL for Mac OS X would also be interesting. I think SDL trunk (1.3) supports OpenGL rendering more

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/6] Use correct types to enable 2G support

2008-02-01 Thread Philip Boulain
On 1 Feb 2008, at 16:09, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert William Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Avi Kivity wrote: : Anthony Liguori wrote: : I think I'll change this too into a single qemu_ram_alloc. That will : fix the bug with KVM when using

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Changelog Makefile Makefile.target TODO ae...

2007-09-18 Thread Philip Boulain
On 18 Sep 2007, at 00:56, Ben Taylor wrote: J. Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 23:14 +0200, Luca wrote: On 9/17/07, Andreas Färber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 17.09.2007 um 14:18 schrieb Christian MICHON: On 9/17/07, Philip Boulain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...merely

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Changelog Makefile Makefile.target TODO ae...

2007-09-17 Thread Philip Boulain
DON'T DO THIS KIND OF COMMIT AGAIN, PLEASE. if we were using git (but you can do it locally anyway), you would not have these conflicts problems... Maybe... but Savannah uses a CVS frontend, as far as I know... Those are excuses. So is a you should have used X argument. It doesn't

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Allowing QEMU to directly execute a directory (and storing command line options in it)

2007-09-03 Thread Philip Boulain
On 1 Sep 2007, at 21:26, Jorge Lucángeli Obes wrote: I think the problem here is that the scope of this change is not clear. I _really_ wish to keep this simple. I _really_ wish to avoid having giant command lines and useless shell scripts. Surely the small shell script /is/ the simple

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Allowing QEMU to directly execute a directory (and storing command line options in it)

2007-09-03 Thread Philip Boulain
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 12:01 +0200, Christian Brunschen wrote: On 3 Sep 2007, at 11:19, Philip Boulain wrote: What's the difference between having to hack about a plain-text, few-lines configuration file, and a plain-text, few-lines shell script? The same shells are not (at least

Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: Storing command line options in images

2007-08-14 Thread Philip Boulain
On 14 Aug 2007, at 00:31, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Philip Boulain wrote: On 13 Aug 2007, at 20:39, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ...implemented in the GNU toolchain, and apparently stems from Windows: qemu @qemu.cfg I'm not familiar with that. Is it just GNU bash shorthand for qemu `cat qemu.cfg

Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: Storing command line options in images

2007-08-13 Thread Philip Boulain
On 13 Aug 2007, at 20:39, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Instead of inventing great and wonderfully complicated schemes, the most sensible way I can think of is to recycle a feature which is now implemented in the GNU toolchain, and apparently stems from Windows: qemu @qemu.cfg I'm not familiar with

Re: [Qemu-devel] Triple-fault causes abort(), which doesn't end pointer grabs

2007-05-08 Thread Philip Boulain
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 18:38 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: Samuel Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, if the guest system has a triple-fault, and I had had my mouse grabbed, it stays grabbed, so that X has to be restarted (as far as I know). Not if you have XF86_Ungrab bound to a key.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Documentation bug in QEMU/KQEMU

2007-03-21 Thread Philip Boulain
On 21 Mar 2007, at 06:13, James Jacobs wrote: It is not mentioned that KQEMU is incompatible with Win98SE. It is also not mentioned that it is incompatible with Linux 0.1. However, if you make a closed world assumption (things which are not stated to be true are false), this is easy to

Re: [Qemu-devel] KQEMU Darwin port status?

2007-03-21 Thread Philip Boulain
On 21 Mar 2007, at 15:39, Derek Fawcus wrote: Well, they seemed to be suggesting that the kernel importing and locking the user space memory was a bit dodgy, and that the kernel should export memory to user space. Or maybe that only really applies in the case of devices... Yes. It's

Re: [Qemu-devel] KQEMU Darwin port status?

2007-03-19 Thread Philip Boulain
On 19 Mar 2007, at 08:49, Mike Kronenberg wrote: I have made a empty kext and a dummy client to do some tests on this topics. Boundary crossing is working well, so by now the kext part is ready. http://www.kronenberg.org/files/kqemu_poc.zip Neat, thanks. Unfortunately, Apple decided to

Re: [Qemu-devel] KQEMU Darwin port status?

2007-03-19 Thread Philip Boulain
On 19 Mar 2007, at 20:23, Derek Fawcus wrote: There was just a discussion relating to this on the darwin-kernel list, you may wish to review the archive. (The thread starts at http://lists.apple.com/archives/Darwin-kernel/ 2007/Mar/msg00010.html). Thanks; looking at this post, I'm probably

Re: [Qemu-devel] KQEMU Darwin port status?

2007-03-19 Thread Philip Boulain
Mike Kronenberg wrote: So any suggestions on how to lock user pages in Darwin would be very welcome. Philip Boulain wrote: Thanks; looking at this post, I'm probably barking up the right tree Right. I've cobbled up the aformentioned prototype, and it working insofar that the modified

[Qemu-devel] KQEMU Darwin port status?

2007-03-17 Thread Philip Boulain
Hi! I'll keep this succinct, because I'm sure they'd be FAQ-grade questions if this list had a FAQ: :) 1) Where's the version repository for KQEMU? It doesn't appear to be under/alongside QEMU itself. 2) Has anyone made any progress with porting KQEMU to Darwin x86? I've had a look at