KAWAKATSU Noritaka kawakatsu.norit...@interdesigntech.co.jp writes:
Hi,
Hi,
I have built u-boot binary for 'qemu-system-mips -M mips'.
It is fine to run ths u-boot binary.
But the same u-boot binary does not run on 'qemu-system-mips64 -M mips'.
I do not understand what happends on the
The usb-msd device emulation needs some small tweaks in the requests
emulations. For instance, the reset/maxlun requests are class/interface
specific so requests for them with the type class and recipient interface
bits sets have to be handled.
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp
pinery pinewood@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
於 四，2010-02-04 於 22:56 +0530，Utkarsh Sopan 提到：
Can you tell me what is the status of adding MIPS64 support?
as at the wiki page it showed Red earlier.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Laurent Desnogues
laurent.desnog...@gmail.com wrote:
Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name writes:
Hi,
CCi386-linux-user/mmap.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/linux-user/mmap.c: In function 'mmap_frag':
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/linux-user/mmap.c:253: error: ignoring return
value of
Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name writes:
Hi,
-fstack-protector-all emit extra code to check for buffer overflows,
such as stack smashing attacks. This is done by adding a guard
variable to functions with vulnerable objects.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name
---
Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi writes:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 02:25:36PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
Note that I have some reservations about the current init_paths() and
path() code:
- their names seem to confusing. Maybe those should be init_base() and
base() or something similar;
-
