[Qemu-devel] [Bug 577908] Re: qemu 0.12.3 default networking DNS broken

2010-12-25 Thread Thomas Orgis
Just tested again with 0.12.5: It seems to work now. Closing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577908 Title: qemu 0.12.3 default networking DNS broken Status in QEMU: Incomplete Bu

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 577908] Re: qemu 0.12.3 default networking DNS broken

2010-06-02 Thread Thomas Orgis
Well... with the debian VM stored in debian.qcow, the minimal command line to trigger the behaviour is qemu -hda debian.qcow I do not try anything fancy -- just the default, which worked in earlier times. -- qemu 0.12.3 default networking DNS broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577908 You re

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU Alpha target

2007-03-29 Thread Thomas Orgis
Well, since I am someone in the lucky position of having alpha hardware in use I can offer to test stuff. I saved two boxen basically from the dumpster, one of which being my primary workstation and the other open for other experiments, even. I don't have time, especially now, but in a month or two

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

2007-03-29 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:56:59 -0400 schrieb Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Saturday 24 March 2007 8:32 am, Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote: > > Anyhow, I expect 32-bit hardware to gradually die because of wear and > > tear in the next few years and the replacement will be 64-bit hardware so >

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

2007-03-26 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:55:16 + schrieb Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The problems of the gcc backend to qemu have already been discussed > extensively on this list. Stealing 3+ registers from gcc on x86 really > is asking for trouble, and I believe it is generally understood that the

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

2007-03-23 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:45:49 + schrieb Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I do not understand enough of QEMU yet, but I have checked out CVS and > > am reading through its source. When I understand more I hope we can fix > > this long-standing annoyance. > > This is GCC PR16185

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

2007-03-23 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:13:00 +0100 schrieb Sunil Amitkumar Janki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have seen this error as well when building with i686/pentium3/athlon > optimisations. As I am doing a course on x86 assembly programming > at the moment I can tell you that it suffers from register starvatio

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

2007-03-22 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:18:40 + schrieb Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The first part is true, the second is not, in that I already upgraded > to the 686 kernel, so the qemu build on FC6 is not fixed by installing the > 686 kernel. So, do we have any other clue about this? Some qemu code

Re: [Qemu-devel] Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

2007-03-18 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:45:00 -0400 schrieb Tony Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >We at SourceMage GNU/Linux got reports of failed builds with that error > >that are apparently fixed by reducing -march cflag to pentium-mmx as > >opposed to pentium2,3,4 or pentium-m as well as any athlon. > >Any sse

Re: [Qemu-devel] Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

2007-03-17 Thread Thomas Orgis
I'd like to add that with qemu 0.9.0 release it's the same problem, that somehow seems to recurr from time to time (seen old similar reports with older qemu release(s)) in helper.c. We at SourceMage GNU/Linux got reports of failed builds with that error that are apparently fixed by reducing -march