Hello
I am trying to build from source the qemu v1.0.1 (from git) on a Ubuntu
mixed system (part is oneiric 11.10, part is precise 12.04)
Here are two issues:
During build of:
hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-handle.c
it gave errors saying it couldnt find definition of AT_EMPTY_PATH.
So I added it at the
Dear qemuers,
thanks for your exellent software.
I would like to use cache=writeback, but I still can't understand if
this is safe or not in case of power loss.
In particular with virtio-blk on bare LVM device.
Qemu manpage still says cache=writeback isn't safe, but I seem to find
some
On 02/20/12 16:06, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/20/2012 08:18 AM, Virtbie wrote:
Dear qemuers,
thanks for your exellent software.
I would like to use cache=writeback, but I still can't understand if
this is
safe or not in case of power loss.
Safe is too simplistic of a view
On 02/20/12 16:43, Virtbie wrote:
Great explanation Anthony,
may I still ask:
1)
Is WCE + volatile flag exposed to the guest, by all three virtual
devices:
- virtio
- scsi
- ide
?
(if not, I still don't understand how this works)
2) Is there a minimum guest kernel and a minimum viostor
Hello all
I am seeing, perhaps unsurprisingly, a skewed system clock after pausing
and then resuming a qemu-kvm guest. The guest continues with its earlier
time.
Since I'd like to use the pause technique for backups, which can take 1
hour, this is significant.
This is with windows guests, and it
