On 8/23/11 4:04 AM, "Joerg Roedel" wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:52:18PM -0400, aafabbri wrote:
>> You have to enforce group/iommu domain assignment whether you have the
>> existing uiommu API, or if you change it to your proposed
>> ioctl(inherit_iom
On 8/22/11 2:49 PM, "Benjamin Herrenschmidt"
wrote:
>
>>> I wouldn't use uiommu for that.
>>
>> Any particular reason besides saving a file descriptor?
>>
>> We use it today, and it seems like a cleaner API than what you propose
>> changing it to.
>
> Well for one, we are back to square on
On 8/22/11 1:49 PM, "Benjamin Herrenschmidt"
wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:29 -0700, aafabbri wrote:
>
>>> Each device fd would then support a
>>> similar set of ioctls and mapping (mmio/pio/config) interface as current
>>> vfio, except for the
On 8/20/11 9:51 AM, "Alex Williamson" wrote:
> We had an extremely productive VFIO BoF on Monday. Here's my attempt to
> capture the plan that I think we agreed to:
>
> We need to address both the description and enforcement of device
> groups. Groups are formed any time the iommu does not
