Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] PRI support for VT-d

2024-07-05 Thread cmd
On 05/07/2024 08:20, Yi Liu wrote: On 2024/7/5 13:13, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote: On 05/07/2024 05:03, Yi Liu wrote: Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe. On 2024/5/30 20:24, CLEMENT

Re: [PATCH ats_vtd v5 04/22] intel_iommu: do not consider wait_desc as an invalid descriptor

2024-07-03 Thread cmd
On 03/07/2024 09:29, Yi Liu wrote: On 2024/7/2 23:29, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote: On 02/07/2024 15:33, Yi Liu wrote: Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe. On 2024/7/2 13:52, CLEMENT

Re: [PATCH ats_vtd v5 04/22] intel_iommu: do not consider wait_desc as an invalid descriptor

2024-07-02 Thread cmd
On 02/07/2024 17:29, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote: On 02/07/2024 15:33, Yi Liu wrote: Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe. On 2024/7/2 13:52, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote: From: Clément

Re: [PATCH] hw/i386/intel_iommu: Block CFI when necessary

2024-06-26 Thread cmd
On 27/06/2024 07:08, Yuke Peng wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:15 PM cmd wrote: Hi, On 25/06/2024 13:28, Yuke Peng wrote: > According to Intel VT-d specification 5.1.4, CFI must be blocked when > Extended Interrupt Mode is enabled or Compatibility format inte

Re: [PATCH] hw/i386/intel_iommu: Block CFI when necessary

2024-06-26 Thread cmd
Hi, On 25/06/2024 13:28, Yuke Peng wrote: According to Intel VT-d specification 5.1.4, CFI must be blocked when Extended Interrupt Mode is enabled or Compatibility format interrupts are disabled. Signed-off-by: Yuke Peng --- hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 28

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] aspeed/soc: Fix possible divide by zero

2024-06-25 Thread cmd
On 25/06/2024 08:03, Cédric Le Goater wrote: On 6/25/24 8:00 AM, cmd wrote: Hi On 25/06/2024 03:50, Jamin Lin via wrote: Coverity reports a possible DIVIDE_BY_ZERO issue regarding the "ram_size" object property. This can not happen because RAM has predefined valid siz

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] aspeed/soc: Fix possible divide by zero

2024-06-25 Thread cmd
Hi On 25/06/2024 03:50, Jamin Lin via wrote: Coverity reports a possible DIVIDE_BY_ZERO issue regarding the "ram_size" object property. This can not happen because RAM has predefined valid sizes per SoC. Nevertheless, add a test to close the issue. Fixes: Coverity CID 1547113 Signed-off-by: