Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add gcc 4.0 support

2006-03-29 Thread sofar
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:24:59 +0200, Pascal Terjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/29/06, John Davidorff Pell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P.S. Why does the list set the reply-to header, isn't that supposed to be a Bad Thing™? Only according to some people :) I hate when I reply to a list and

[Qemu-devel] BUG: kqemu omits MODULE_LICENSE making tainted kernel go unnoticed

2006-03-22 Thread sofar
Hi, kqemu 0.7.x omits the MODULE_LICENSE symbol and does not signify that it taints the kernel. This is unwanted - kqemu is a proprietary module and it should expose itself to the kernel as such. It is bad enough that kqemu is closed source - but it is even worse if kqemu doesn't tell the