Hi,
Would anyone help to review this patch-set ?
I'm not quit sure if this is a suitable way solve this problem.
Thanks.
On 08/27/2014 04:14 PM, tangchen wrote:
Forgot to mention, this patch-set is based on the following patch-set:
[RESEND PATCH v3 0/8] QEmu memory hot unplug su
On 08/26/2014 10:24 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
..
Just to remind - Windows will not add pc dimms without populated SRAT,
so imho forcing NUMA topology to be set (and whose support is required
anyway from guest linux kernel in order to support ACPI hotplug) is
better than approach proposed by
On 08/26/2014 10:24 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
..
Just to remind - Windows will not add pc dimms without populated SRAT,
so imho forcing NUMA topology to be set (and whose support is required
anyway from guest linux kernel in order to support ACPI hotplug) is
better than approach proposed by
Forgot to mention, this patch-set is based on the following patch-set:
[RESEND PATCH v3 0/8] QEmu memory hot unplug support.
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg253018.html
Thanks.
On 08/27/2014 04:09 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
When doing memory hotplug, QEmu is not aware of guest
Hi ,
Would anybody help to review this patch ?
Thanks. :)
On 08/19/2014 09:55 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
If user doesn't specify numa options, nb_numa_nodes will be 0. But
PCDIMMDevice->node
is also initialized to 0. As a result, the following check will fail:
pc_dimm_realize()
{
..
Hi Michael, Paolo
Thanks for the advices. Will send a v2 patch soon.
Thanks.
On 08/19/2014 04:04 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:58:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/08/2014 15:56, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
+/* Initialize PCDIMMDevice->node to -1 so that ev
