From: Wei Yang
The assert would be touched when the version of acpica is greater than or
equal to 20160318. its reason is that "Disasembler: Update a couple
output items(commit id: 1ecbb3d)" is introduced by Robert, the patch
emits the AML filename as a zero-length string, and
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 07:11:39PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>05.03.2016 16:47, Wei Yang wrote:
>>According to linux kernel commit <89c1e79eb30> ("linux/bitmap.h: improve
>>BITMAP_{LAST,FIRST}_WORD_MASK"), these two macro could be improved.
>>
>>This
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:32:25AM +, Li, Liang Z wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >6. Handling page cache in the guest The memory used for page
>> >> >> >cache in the guest will change depends on the workload, if guest
>> >> >> >run some block IO intensive work load, there will
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Wou
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:48:22AM +, Li, Liang Z wrote:
[...]
>> > 8. Pseudo code
>> > Dirty page logging should be enabled before getting the free page
>> > information from guest, this is important because during the process
>> > of getting free pages, some free pages may be used and written
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:35:42PM +, Li, Liang Z wrote:
>> >No special purpose. Maybe it's caused by the email client. I didn't
>> >find the character in the original doc.
>> >
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg00715.html
>>
>> You could take a look at this link,
#x27;, and I'm honestly a bit surprised that git doesn't do
>it automatically.
>
Oh, first time to notice this, interesting~
>--
>Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
>Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 07:18:57AM +, Li, Liang Z wrote:
>> Hi, Liang
>>
>> This is a very clear documentation of your work, I appreciated it a lot.
>> Below
>> are some of my personal opinion and question.
>>
>
>Thanks for your comments!
>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:43:49PM +0800, Liang
Hi, Liang
This is a very clear documentation of your work, I appreciated it a lot. Below
are some of my personal opinion and question.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:43:49PM +0800, Liang Li wrote:
>I have sent the RFC version patch set for live migration optimization
>by skipping processing the free
for your comment. By using the macro, audience is more easy to
understand it tries to get the position of next capability.
>
>Each capability is a node of a linked list, and the position of the next
>capability is at offset 1 inside the capability (here it is at offset 1
>from the tmp or pos base). I think the patch is an improvement.
>
Thanks Paolo for your reply. :-)
>Paolo
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Hi, Tianyu,
I am testing your V2 patch set in our environment, while facing two issues
now. Have a workaround for the first one and hope you could share some light
on the second one :-)
1. Mismatch for ram_block (Have a workaround)
-
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:47:53AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>On 06/03/2016 02:57, Wei Yang wrote:
>> By using utilities in bitops and bitmap, this patch tries to make it more
>> friendly to audience. No functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
By using utilities in bitops and bitmap, this patch tries to make it more
friendly to audience. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
---
kvm-all.c | 34 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index
According to linux kernel commit <89c1e79eb30> ("linux/bitmap.h: improve
BITMAP_{LAST,FIRST}_WORD_MASK"), these two macro could be improved.
This patch takes this change and also move them all in header file.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
---
include/qemu/bitmap.h | 7 ++
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:40:15AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:18:11 +0000
>Wei Yang wrote:
>
>> Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
>> the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
>>
>> This patch us
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:17:11PM +0800, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
>于 Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:15:07 +0100
>Christian Borntraeger 写道:
>
>> On 02/19/2016 04:18 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> > Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
>> > the more
Hi, Amit
Do you like this one?
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:50:30PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
>In qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy(), it iterates on each device to add
>a json object and transfer related status to destination, while the order
>of the last two steps could be refined.
&
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 09:45:32AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:18:10 +0000
>Wei Yang wrote:
>
>> Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
>> the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
>>
>> This patch us
Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MSIX entries.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
CC: Cornelia Huck
CC: Christian Borntraeger
---
hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c |2 +-
1 file
Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MSIX entries.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
---
hw/vfio/pci.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw
These two patches replace the PCI_CAP_FLAGS with PCI_MSIX_FLAGS on retrieving
the MSIX entries. The change is the same, while I put them in two patches for
different author to review.
Wei Yang (2):
vfio/pci: use PCI_MSIX_FLAGS on retrieving the MSIX entries
s390x/pci: use PCI_MSIX_FLAGS on
Hello everyone,
Is this one correct?
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:50:30PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
>In qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy(), it iterates on each device to add
>a json object and transfer related status to destination, while the order
>of the last two steps could b
Use the macro PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT instead of 1, so that the code would be
more self-explain.
This patch makes this change and also fixs one typo in comment.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
---
hw/vfio/pci.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw
()
json_end_object()
save_section_footer()
After the change:
json_start_object()
save_section_header()
vmstate_save()
save_section_footer()
json_end_object()
This patch reorder the code to to make it symmetric. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>24.01.2016 17:09, Wei Yang wrote:
>> The index is duplicated. Just change it.
>
>It is indeed, with previous being 2.5 as well
>and the next being 3. Applying to -trivial.
>
>Please the next time send
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:45:27PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>24.01.2016 17:09, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Within the if statement, time_spent is assured to be non-zero.
>>
>> This patch just removes the check on time_spent when calculating mbs.
>
>The if statement
Paolo,
Sorry, maybe I am not familiar with the patch format in qemu-dev.
I didn't see the From: Wei Yang in this one neither.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:39:53AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>get_real_device() has 5 parameters with the last 4 is contained in the first
>structure.
&g
Paolo,
Is it necessary to add this?
From: Wei Yang
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:03:35AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>get_real_device() has 5 parameters with the last 4 is contained in the first
>structure.
>
>This patch removes the last 4 parameters and directly use them fr
get_real_device() has 5 parameters with the last 4 is contained in the first
structure.
This patch removes the last 4 parameters and directly use them from the first
parameter.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
---
hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c |9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions
All,
I saw a makefile rule which confused.
This is in the tests/Makefile
.PHONY: $(patsubst %, check-qtest-%, $(QTEST_TARGETS))
$(patsubst %, check-qtest-%, $(QTEST_TARGETS)): check-qtest-%: $(check-qtest-y)
$(call quiet-command,QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=$*-softmmu/qemu-system-$* \
>> You can also try my patch :
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/137543/
>
> Unless there is a use case beyond this x86 band-aid, lets focus on
> getting gdb right. Reminds me that gdb folks asked me to file a bug
> about this - which I still need to do. :-/
>
> Jan
>
Jan, I didn't try your
2012/3/17 Jan Kiszka :
> [ re-added qemu-devel to CC ]
>
> On 2012-03-17 13:10, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> Two major issues with this procedure:
>>>
>>> 1. When using kvm, a soft breakpoint (as set by 'b') will inject a trap
>>> instruction i
b start_kernel
c
Then the guest will run very happily
Also use the "info b " could show the break point is set.
Which step I made a mistake?
--
Wei Yang
Help You, Help Me
All
In function ohci_service_td() , there is a loop.
for (i = 0; i < ohci->num_ports; i++) {
dev = ohci->rhport[i].port.dev;
if ((ohci->rhport[i].ctrl & OHCI_PORT_PES) == 0)
continue;
if (ohci->async_td) {
/* ??? The har
2012/2/19 Peter Maydell :
> On 18 February 2012 16:19, Wei Yang wrote:
>> I am reading the code in ohci_service_td().
>>
>> There is a calculation of the length of the buffer.
>>
>> if ((td.cbp & 0xf000) != (td.be & 0xf000)) {
>>
I am reading the code in ohci_service_td().
There is a calculation of the length of the buffer.
if ((td.cbp & 0xf000) != (td.be & 0xf000)) {
len = (td.be & 0xfff) + 0x1001 - (td.cbp & 0xfff);
} else {
len = (td.be - td.cbp) + 1;
}
I am curi
Hi, this kind of trace is not popular?
2012/2/12 Wei Yang :
> All
>
> I enable the trace function with --enable-trace-backend=simple and I
> create the event file like this
> g_realloc
> g_malloc
>
> Then I start the qemu with following command.
> ./i386-softmmu/q
2012/2/11 malc :
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012, Andreas F?rber wrote:
>
>> Am 10.02.2012 11:26, schrieb ???:
>> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:14:41AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 06:33:16PM +0800, ??? wrote:
>> >>> I am running a tiny OS on QEMU and debugging it with gdbstub.
All
I enable the trace function with --enable-trace-backend=simple and I
create the event file like this
g_realloc
g_malloc
Then I start the qemu with following command.
./i386-softmmu/qemu-system-i386 -enable-kvm -drive
file=../../kvm/ubuntu.img -boot dc -m 512 -usb
-monitor stdio -trace events
Tested on i386 platform.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
---
qemu-timer.c | 40
qemu-timer.h | 41 +
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu-timer.c b/qemu-timer.c
index cd026c6..2b5cc48
701 - 739 of 739 matches
Mail list logo
