> On 7 Oct 2022, at 15:21, Ani Sinha <a...@anisinha.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 8:16 PM Miguel Luis <miguel.l...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The ACPI GTDT table contains two invalid 64-bit physical addresses according 
>> to
>> the ACPI spec. 6.5 [1]. Those are the Counter Control Base physical address 
>> and
>> the Counter Read Base physical address. Those fields of the GTDT table 
>> should be
>> set to 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF if not provided, rather than 0x0.
>> 
>> [1]: 
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html*gtdt-table-structure__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!I-YqmAwYNhk19YHxcbjQBMwEE9a8rZOvufvOOonAPEtgTynOYOf5AyYKLTTGJ2RRzsjvkjIuleSubpg$
>>   
>> 
>> Changelog:
>> 
>> v2:
>>    Updated with collected tags from v1.
> 
> For future reference, there is no need to send out a new version with
> just the tags added. The tooling make sure that the tags are collected
> correctly from the last version.
> 

Great! Thanks for the tip which is very helpful.

Miguel

>> 
>> v1: 
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-09/msg02847.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!I-YqmAwYNhk19YHxcbjQBMwEE9a8rZOvufvOOonAPEtgTynOYOf5AyYKLTTGJ2RRzsjvkjIulSis4m4$
>>   
>> 
>> Miguel Luis (3):
>>  tests/acpi: virt: allow acpi GTDT changes
>>  acpi: arm/virt: build_gtdt: fix invalid 64-bit physical addresses
>>  tests/acpi: virt: update ACPI GTDT binaries
>> 
>> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c          |   5 ++---
>> tests/data/acpi/virt/GTDT         | Bin 96 -> 96 bytes
>> tests/data/acpi/virt/GTDT.memhp   | Bin 96 -> 96 bytes
>> tests/data/acpi/virt/GTDT.numamem | Bin 96 -> 96 bytes
>> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> --
>> 2.37.3
>> 


Reply via email to