Doesn’t ‘max’ support being there mean we are supposed to support various
types of CPUs on the SBSA board?
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 18:00 Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 09:46, Itaru Kitayama
> wrote:
> >
> > In target/arm/cpu64.c, CPU init function for A64FX is there, add this
> >
On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 09:46, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>
> In target/arm/cpu64.c, CPU init function for A64FX is there, add this
> CPU to the sbsa-ref board.
(cc'ing the sbsa-ref maintainers)
This isn't an objection, but I would like to know what the
sbsa-ref maintainers' view is on what CPUs the b
In target/arm/cpu64.c, CPU init function for A64FX is there, add this
CPU to the sbsa-ref board.
Signed-off-by: Itaru Kitayama
---
hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c b/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c
index 4bb444684f..a7d27b2e55 100644
--- a/hw/arm/sbsa-ref
