On 4/1/22 10:08, Richard Henderson wrote:
Coverity reports out-of-bound accesses within cputlb.c.
This should be a false positive due to how the index is
decoded from MemOpIdx. To be fair, nothing is checking
the correct bounds during encoding either.
Assert index in range before use, both to
Richard Henderson writes:
> Coverity reports out-of-bound accesses within cputlb.c.
> This should be a false positive due to how the index is
> decoded from MemOpIdx. To be fair, nothing is checking
> the correct bounds during encoding either.
>
> Assert index in range before use, both to
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 18:08, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> Coverity reports out-of-bound accesses within cputlb.c.
> This should be a false positive due to how the index is
> decoded from MemOpIdx. To be fair, nothing is checking
> the correct bounds during encoding either.
>
> Assert index in
Ping.
On 4/1/22 10:08, Richard Henderson wrote:
Coverity reports out-of-bound accesses within cputlb.c.
This should be a false positive due to how the index is
decoded from MemOpIdx. To be fair, nothing is checking
the correct bounds during encoding either.
Assert index in range before use,
Coverity reports out-of-bound accesses within cputlb.c.
This should be a false positive due to how the index is
decoded from MemOpIdx. To be fair, nothing is checking
the correct bounds during encoding either.
Assert index in range before use, both to catch user errors
and to pacify static
