On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:31:04PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 06:52:11 -0400
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:49:42AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:11:48 -0400
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > we
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 06:52:11 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:49:42AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:11:48 -0400
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > we had such a beautiful structure for updating
> > > expected files, designed to
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 18:01 Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 06:52:11 -0400
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:49:42AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:11:48 -0400
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > we had such a
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:49:42AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:11:48 -0400
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > we had such a beautiful structure for updating
> > expected files, designed to keep bisect working.
> > It turns out that we ignored the result of
> > the allow
On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:11:48 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> we had such a beautiful structure for updating
> expected files, designed to keep bisect working.
> It turns out that we ignored the result of
> the allow list checks unless all tables matched
> anyway.
>
> Sigh.
strange,
it
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 8:41 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> we had such a beautiful structure for updating
> expected files, designed to keep bisect working.
> It turns out that we ignored the result of
> the allow list checks unless all tables matched
> anyway.
Doh! Seems the bug is present
we had such a beautiful structure for updating
expected files, designed to keep bisect working.
It turns out that we ignored the result of
the allow list checks unless all tables matched
anyway.
Sigh.
Let's at least make it work going forward.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
