On 02.11.23 15:59, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 01.11.23 20:53, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 31.10.23 17:05, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 04.10.23 15:56, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Actually block job is not completed without the final flush.
On 01.11.23 20:53, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 31.10.23 17:05, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 04.10.23 15:56, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Actually block job is not completed without the final flush. It's
rather unexpected to have broken target
On 31.10.23 17:05, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 04.10.23 15:56, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Actually block job is not completed without the final flush. It's
rather unexpected to have broken target when job was successfully
completed long ago and now we
On 04.10.23 15:56, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Actually block job is not completed without the final flush. It's
rather unexpected to have broken target when job was successfully
completed long ago and now we fail to flush or process just
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Actually block job is not completed without the final flush. It's
rather unexpected to have broken target when job was successfully
completed long ago and now we fail to flush or process just
crashed/killed.
Mirror job already has mirror_flush() for this. So,
