On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 5:23 AM Alistair Francis
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:22 PM Atish Patra wrote:
> >
> > Since commit 40244040a7ac, multi-socket configuration with plic is
> > broken as the hartid for second socket is calculated incorrectly.
> > The hartid stored in addr_config
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:22 PM Atish Patra wrote:
>
> Since commit 40244040a7ac, multi-socket configuration with plic is
> broken as the hartid for second socket is calculated incorrectly.
> The hartid stored in addr_config already includes the offset
> for the base hartid for that socket.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:30 AM Atish Kumar Patra wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 6:14 PM Alistair Francis wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:22 PM Atish Patra wrote:
>> >
>> > Since commit 40244040a7ac, multi-socket configuration with plic is
>> > broken as the hartid for second
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 6:14 PM Alistair Francis
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:22 PM Atish Patra wrote:
> >
> > Since commit 40244040a7ac, multi-socket configuration with plic is
> > broken as the hartid for second socket is calculated incorrectly.
> > The hartid stored in addr_config
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:22 PM Atish Patra wrote:
>
> Since commit 40244040a7ac, multi-socket configuration with plic is
> broken as the hartid for second socket is calculated incorrectly.
> The hartid stored in addr_config already includes the offset
> for the base hartid for that socket.
Since commit 40244040a7ac, multi-socket configuration with plic is
broken as the hartid for second socket is calculated incorrectly.
The hartid stored in addr_config already includes the offset
for the base hartid for that socket. Adding it again would lead
to segfault while creating the plic
