Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-18 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:35:17 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > On 17/10/2019 20.18, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > On 10/17/19 4:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 17/10/2019 16.34, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:21:23 +0200 > >>> Thomas Huth wrote: > >>> > There is no

Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-18 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 10/18/19 8:35 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: On 17/10/2019 20.18, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: On 10/17/19 4:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: On 17/10/2019 16.34, Cornelia Huck wrote: On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:21:23 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with

Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-18 Thread Thomas Huth
On 17/10/2019 20.18, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 10/17/19 4:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 17/10/2019 16.34, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:21:23 +0200 >>> Thomas Huth wrote: >>> There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with "-machine ...,usb=on"

Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-17 Thread Markus Armbruster
Cornelia Huck writes: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:40:56 +0200 > Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 17/10/2019 16.34, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:21:23 +0200 >> > Thomas Huth wrote: >> > >> >> There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with >> >> "-machine ...,usb=on"

Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-17 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 10/17/19 4:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: On 17/10/2019 16.34, Cornelia Huck wrote: On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:21:23 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with "-machine ...,usb=on" is certainly wrong. Emit a warning to make the users aware of their

Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-17 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/17/19 9:45 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: On 17.10.19 16:21, Thomas Huth wrote: There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with "-machine ...,usb=on" is certainly wrong. Emit a warning to make the users aware of their misconfiguration. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth ---

Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-17 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:40:56 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > On 17/10/2019 16.34, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:21:23 +0200 > > Thomas Huth wrote: > > > >> There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with > >> "-machine ...,usb=on" is certainly wrong. Emit a warning

Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-17 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 17.10.19 16:21, Thomas Huth wrote: > There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with > "-machine ...,usb=on" is certainly wrong. Emit a warning to make > the users aware of their misconfiguration. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > --- > After a year or two, we could finally

Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-17 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:21:23 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with > "-machine ...,usb=on" is certainly wrong. Emit a warning to make > the users aware of their misconfiguration. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > --- > After a year or two, we

Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-17 Thread Thomas Huth
On 17/10/2019 16.34, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:21:23 +0200 > Thomas Huth wrote: > >> There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with >> "-machine ...,usb=on" is certainly wrong. Emit a warning to make >> the users aware of their misconfiguration. >> >>

[PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB

2019-10-17 Thread Thomas Huth
There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with "-machine ...,usb=on" is certainly wrong. Emit a warning to make the users aware of their misconfiguration. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- After a year or two, we could finally turn this into a hard error, but I think we should give