Hello Giuseppe,
On 4/10/20 11:14 PM, LemonBoy wrote:
> From 11d0cfe58d12e0f191b435ade88622cfceb2098a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: LemonBoy
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:55:26 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] linux-user/sparc64: Translate flushw opcode
>
> The ifdef logic shou
020 22:55:26 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] linux-user/sparc64: Translate flushw opcode
>
> The ifdef logic should unconditionally compile in the `xop == 0x2b` case
> when targeting sparc64.
>
> Fix the handling of window spill traps by keeping cansave into account
> when calculatin
On 4/10/20 2:14 PM, LemonBoy wrote:
> From 11d0cfe58d12e0f191b435ade88622cfceb2098a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: LemonBoy
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:55:26 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] linux-user/sparc64: Translate flushw opcode
>
> The ifdef logic should unconditionally c
onBoy a écrit :
> > Ping, I forgot to CC the SPARC mantainers in the previous mail.
> >
> > On 10/04/20 23:14, LemonBoy wrote:
> >> From 11d0cfe58d12e0f191b435ade88622cfceb2098a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: LemonBoy
> >> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:5
:
>> From 11d0cfe58d12e0f191b435ade88622cfceb2098a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: LemonBoy
>> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:55:26 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] linux-user/sparc64: Translate flushw opcode
>>
>> The ifdef logic should unconditionally compile in the `xop == 0x2b` case
>
Ping, I forgot to CC the SPARC mantainers in the previous mail.
On 10/04/20 23:14, LemonBoy wrote:
> From 11d0cfe58d12e0f191b435ade88622cfceb2098a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: LemonBoy
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:55:26 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] linux-user/sparc64: Translate f
>From 11d0cfe58d12e0f191b435ade88622cfceb2098a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: LemonBoy
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:55:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] linux-user/sparc64: Translate flushw opcode
The ifdef logic should unconditionally compile in the `xop == 0x2b` case
when targeting sparc64.