Le 09/07/2020 à 22:00, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
> In new functions print_ioctl() and print_syscall_ret_ioctl(), we don't
> check if lock_user() returns NULL and this would cause a segfault in
> thunk_print().
>
> If lock_user() returns NULL don't call thunk_print() but prints only the
> value of
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 21:00, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> In new functions print_ioctl() and print_syscall_ret_ioctl(), we don't
> check if lock_user() returns NULL and this would cause a segfault in
> thunk_print().
>
> If lock_user() returns NULL don't call thunk_print() but prints only the
>
In new functions print_ioctl() and print_syscall_ret_ioctl(), we don't
check if lock_user() returns NULL and this would cause a segfault in
thunk_print().
If lock_user() returns NULL don't call thunk_print() but prints only the
value of the (invalid) pointer.
Tested with:
# cat ioctl.c
