Dear qemu-stable,
can you please consider adding this patch to the qemu-stable branch.
Upstream commit 78721301138114cf37fb179a6cf73a27c1b3a927
Thanks,
Helge
On 2/13/21 8:16 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 10/02/2021 à 07:12, Helge Deller a écrit :
On the hppa target userspace binaries may call
Le 10/02/2021 à 07:12, Helge Deller a écrit :
> On the hppa target userspace binaries may call signalfd4() and
> eventfd2() with an old TARGET_O_NONBLOCK value of 00024 instead of
> 00020 for the "mask" syscall parameter, in which case the current
> emulation doesn't handle the translation
Le 13/02/2021 à 20:05, Helge Deller a écrit :
> On 2/13/21 5:38 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 10/02/2021 à 07:12, Helge Deller a écrit :
>>> On the hppa target userspace binaries may call signalfd4() and
>>> eventfd2() with an old TARGET_O_NONBLOCK value of 00024 instead of
>>> 00020 for
On 2/13/21 5:38 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 10/02/2021 à 07:12, Helge Deller a écrit :
On the hppa target userspace binaries may call signalfd4() and
eventfd2() with an old TARGET_O_NONBLOCK value of 00024 instead of
00020 for the "mask" syscall parameter, in which case the current
emul
Le 10/02/2021 à 07:12, Helge Deller a écrit :
> On the hppa target userspace binaries may call signalfd4() and
> eventfd2() with an old TARGET_O_NONBLOCK value of 00024 instead of
> 00020 for the "mask" syscall parameter, in which case the current
> emulation doesn't handle the translation
On the hppa target userspace binaries may call signalfd4() and
eventfd2() with an old TARGET_O_NONBLOCK value of 00024 instead of
00020 for the "mask" syscall parameter, in which case the current
emulation doesn't handle the translation to the native O_NONBLOCK value
correctly.
The 0x04 bi