[PATCH] migration/rdma: Fix return-path case

2023-03-14 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" The RDMA code has return-path handling code, but it's only enabled if postcopy is enabled; if the 'return-path' migration capability is enabled, the return path is NOT setup but the core migration code still tries to use it and breaks. Enable the RDMA return path i

Re: [PATCH] migration/rdma: Fix return-path case

2023-03-14 Thread Peter Xu
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 05:15:58PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" > > The RDMA code has return-path handling code, but it's only enabled > if postcopy is enabled; if the 'return-path' migration capability > is enabled, the return path is NOT setup but

Re: [PATCH] migration/rdma: Fix return-path case

2023-03-14 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 05:15:58PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" > > > > The RDMA code has return-path handling code, but it's only enabled > > if postcopy is enabled; if the 'return-path' migration capability

Re: [PATCH] migration/rdma: Fix return-path case

2023-03-14 Thread lizhij...@fujitsu.com
On 15/03/2023 01:15, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" > > The RDMA code has return-path handling code, but it's only enabled > if postcopy is enabled; if the 'return-path' migration capability > is enabled, the return path is NOT setup but the core migration

Re: [PATCH] migration/rdma: Fix return-path case

2023-03-16 Thread Juan Quintela
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" wrote: > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" > > The RDMA code has return-path handling code, but it's only enabled > if postcopy is enabled; if the 'return-path' migration capability > is enabled, the return path is NOT setup but the core migration > code still tries to