When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen() is set
to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_internal(), which will
lead to socket connection error (the queue of pending connections is full)
when "multifd" and "multifd-channels" are set later on and a high number
On Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:52 PM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
> When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen() is set
> to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_internal(), which will
> lead to socket connection error (the queue of pending connections is full)
> when "multif
Lei Wang wrote:
> When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen() is set
> to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_internal(), which will
> lead to socket connection error (the queue of pending connections is full)
> when "multifd" and "multifd-channels" are set la
"Wang, Wei W" wrote:
> On Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:52 PM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
>> When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen() is set
>> to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_internal(), which will
>> lead to socket connection error (the queue of pending connecti
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:13:58AM +, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> On Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:52 PM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
> > When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen() is set
> > to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_internal(), which will
> > lead to socket conne
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:13:58AM +, Wang, Wei W wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:52 PM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
>> > When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen() is
>> > set
>> > to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_internal(
On Thursday, May 18, 2023 8:43 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
>
> Are you using -incoming defer?
>
> No? right.
>
> With multifd, you should use -incoming defer.
Yes, just confirmed that it works well with deferred incoming.
I think we should enforce this kind of requirement in the code.
I'll mak
"Wang, Wei W" wrote:
> On Thursday, May 18, 2023 8:43 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>>
>> Are you using -incoming defer?
>>
>> No? right.
>>
>> With multifd, you should use -incoming defer.
>
> Yes, just confirmed that it works well with deferred incoming.
> I think we should enforce this kind
On 5/18/2023 17:16, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Lei Wang wrote:
>> When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen() is set
>> to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_internal(), which will
>> lead to socket connection error (the queue of pending connections is full)
>> w
On Friday, May 19, 2023 9:31 AM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
> On 5/18/2023 17:16, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > Lei Wang wrote:
> >> When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen()
> >> is set to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_internal(),
> >> which will lead to socket con
On 5/19/2023 10:44, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> On Friday, May 19, 2023 9:31 AM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
>> On 5/18/2023 17:16, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> Lei Wang wrote:
When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen()
is set to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_inte
On Friday, May 19, 2023 10:52 AM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
> > We can change it to uint16_t or uint32_t, but need to see if listening
> > on a larger value is OK to everyone.
>
> Is there any use case to use >256 migration channels? If not, then I suppose
> it's no need to increase it.
People can choose
"Wang, Wei W" wrote:
> On Friday, May 19, 2023 9:31 AM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
>> On 5/18/2023 17:16, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> > Lei Wang wrote:
>> >> When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen()
>> >> is set to 1 as default in socket_start_incoming_migration_internal(),
>> >>
"Wang, Wei W" wrote:
> On Friday, May 19, 2023 10:52 AM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
>> > We can change it to uint16_t or uint32_t, but need to see if listening
>> > on a larger value is OK to everyone.
>>
>> Is there any use case to use >256 migration channels? If not, then I suppose
>> it's no need to in
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:22:20PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> "Wang, Wei W" wrote:
> > On Friday, May 19, 2023 9:31 AM, Wang, Lei4 wrote:
> >> On 5/18/2023 17:16, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> > Lei Wang wrote:
> >> >> When destination VM is launched, the "backlog" parameter for listen()
> >> >> i
15 matches
Mail list logo