09.02.2024 00:21, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 06:37, Michael Tokarev wrote:
for (;;) {
-bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
+bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES);
Hmm. This smells like a -stable material, but you know
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 06:37, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> 30.01.2024 03:27, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > The following expression is incorrect because blk_pread_nonzeroes()
> > deals in units of bytes, not sectors:
> >
> >bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS)
> >
30.01.2024 03:27, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The following expression is incorrect because blk_pread_nonzeroes()
deals in units of bytes, not sectors:
bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS)
^^^
BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES is the appropr
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:27:12PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The following expression is incorrect because blk_pread_nonzeroes()
> deals in units of bytes, not sectors:
>
> bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS)
> ^^^
>
> BDR
On 30/1/24 01:27, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The following expression is incorrect because blk_pread_nonzeroes()
deals in units of bytes, not sectors:
bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS)
^^^
BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES is the appropr
The following expression is incorrect because blk_pread_nonzeroes()
deals in units of bytes, not sectors:
bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS)
^^^
BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES is the appropriate constant.
Fixes: a4b15a8b9ef2 ("pflash:
