On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 13:56, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> Commit 1e63fe685804 ("machine: pass QAPI struct to mc->smp_parse")
> introduced documentation stating that a zero input value for an SMP
> parameter indicates that its value should be automatically configured.
> This is indeed how things work
On 8/17/21 2:53 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Commit 1e63fe685804 ("machine: pass QAPI struct to mc->smp_parse")
> introduced documentation stating that a zero input value for an SMP
> parameter indicates that its value should be automatically configured.
> This is indeed how things work today, but
On Tue, Aug 17 2021, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Commit 1e63fe685804 ("machine: pass QAPI struct to mc->smp_parse")
> introduced documentation stating that a zero input value for an SMP
> parameter indicates that its value should be automatically configured.
> This is indeed how things work today, but
On 17/08/21 14:53, Andrew Jones wrote:
Commit 1e63fe685804 ("machine: pass QAPI struct to mc->smp_parse")
introduced documentation stating that a zero input value for an SMP
parameter indicates that its value should be automatically configured.
This is indeed how things work today, but we'd like
On 2021/8/17 20:53, Andrew Jones wrote:
Commit 1e63fe685804 ("machine: pass QAPI struct to mc->smp_parse")
introduced documentation stating that a zero input value for an SMP
parameter indicates that its value should be automatically configured.
This is indeed how things work today, but we'd
Commit 1e63fe685804 ("machine: pass QAPI struct to mc->smp_parse")
introduced documentation stating that a zero input value for an SMP
parameter indicates that its value should be automatically configured.
This is indeed how things work today, but we'd like to change that.
Avoid documenting