Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: correct "code should not be reached" for x-rv128

2022-01-27 Thread Alistair Francis
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 5:54 PM Frédéric Pétrot wrote: > > The addition of uxl support in gdbstub adds a few checks on the maximum > register length, but omitted MXL_RV128, leading to the occurence of > "code should not be reached" in a few places. > This patch makes rv128 react as rv64 for gdb, a

Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: correct "code should not be reached" for x-rv128

2022-01-24 Thread Frédéric Pétrot
Le 24/01/2022 à 09:47, LIU Zhiwei a écrit : On 2022/1/24 下午3:49, Frédéric Pétrot wrote: The addition of uxl support in gdbstub adds a few checks on the maximum register length, but omitted MXL_RV128, leading to the occurence of "code should not be reached" in a few places. This patch makes rv12

Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: correct "code should not be reached" for x-rv128

2022-01-24 Thread LIU Zhiwei
On 2022/1/24 下午3:49, Frédéric Pétrot wrote: The addition of uxl support in gdbstub adds a few checks on the maximum register length, but omitted MXL_RV128, leading to the occurence of "code should not be reached" in a few places. This patch makes rv128 react as rv64 for gdb, as previously. If

[PATCH] target/riscv: correct "code should not be reached" for x-rv128

2022-01-23 Thread Frédéric Pétrot
The addition of uxl support in gdbstub adds a few checks on the maximum register length, but omitted MXL_RV128, leading to the occurence of "code should not be reached" in a few places. This patch makes rv128 react as rv64 for gdb, as previously. Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pétrot --- target/riscv/g