Re: [PATCH] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-18 Thread Kautuk Consul
On 2023-04-18 09:07:53, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 18/04/2023 07.53, Kautuk Consul wrote: > > Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the > > boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc > > decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on > > https://lore.kernel.org

Re: [PATCH] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-18 Thread Thomas Huth
On 18/04/2023 07.53, Kautuk Consul wrote: Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4@linaro.org/ it was mentioned tha

[PATCH] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-17 Thread Kautuk Consul
Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modif