On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 11:48:59PM +0800, luzhixing12345 wrote:
> Front-end message requests which need reply should set NEED_REPLY_MASK
> in flag, and response from slave need clear NEED_REPLY_MASK flag.
neither this.
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost-user.c| 2 +-
> subprojects/libv
Signed-off-by: luzhixing12345
>On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 12:53:19PM GMT, 陆知行 wrote:
>>Hi, can someone review this patch?
>>I find requests which call vhost_user_get_u64 does not set NEED_REPLY flag
>
>Can you provide an example to trigger this issue?
>
>Also, with this change all calls to vhost_us
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 12:53:19PM GMT, 陆知行 wrote:
Hi, can someone review this patch?
I find requests which call vhost_user_get_u64 does not set NEED_REPLY flag
Can you provide an example to trigger this issue?
Also, with this change all calls to vhost_user_get_u64() will set that
flag, is t
Hi, can someone review this patch?
I find requests which call vhost_user_get_u64 does not set NEED_REPLY flag
luzhixing12345 于2024年8月4日周日 23:50写道：
> Front-end message requests which need reply should set NEED_REPLY_MASK
> in flag, and response from slave need clear NEED_REPLY_MASK flag.
>
> ---
Front-end message requests which need reply should set NEED_REPLY_MASK
in flag, and response from slave need clear NEED_REPLY_MASK flag.
---
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c| 2 +-
subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --g
