On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:35:55PM +0800, Yuxue Liu yuxue@jaguarmicro.com
wrote:
> From: Yuxue Liu
>
> In the scenario where vhost-user sets eventfd to -1,
> qemu_chr_fe_get_msgfds retrieves fd as -1. When vhost_user_read
> receives, it does not perform blocking operations on the descriptor
om
Sent: April 18, 2024 23:41
To: Gavin Liu gavin@jaguarmicro.com
Cc: pbonz...@redhat.com; lviv...@redhat.com; th...@redhat.com;
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-user-test: no set non-blocking for cal fd less than
0.
External Mail: This email originated from OUTSIDE of the organization!
Do
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:35:55PM +0800, Yuxue Liu yuxue@jaguarmicro.com
wrote:
> From: Yuxue Liu
>
> In the scenario where vhost-user sets eventfd to -1,
> qemu_chr_fe_get_msgfds retrieves fd as -1. When vhost_user_read
> receives, it does not perform blocking operations on the descriptor
On 11/04/2024 09.35, Yuxue Liu yuxue@jaguarmicro.com wrote:
From: Yuxue Liu
In the scenario where vhost-user sets eventfd to -1,
qemu_chr_fe_get_msgfds retrieves fd as -1. When vhost_user_read
receives, it does not perform blocking operations on the descriptor
with fd=-1, so non-blocking op
From: Yuxue Liu
In the scenario where vhost-user sets eventfd to -1,
qemu_chr_fe_get_msgfds retrieves fd as -1. When vhost_user_read
receives, it does not perform blocking operations on the descriptor
with fd=-1, so non-blocking operations should not be performed here
either.This is a normal use
