On Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2020 02:28:03 CET Pan Nengyuan wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-device.c b/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-device.c
> >>> index b5a7c03f26..b146387ae2 100644
> >>> --- a/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-device.c
> >>> +++ b/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-device.c
> >>> @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ static void virt
On 1/14/2020 10:17 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020 11:08:59 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>> On Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020 08:40:20 CET pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
>>> From: Pan Nengyuan
>>>
>>> v->vq forgot to cleanup in virtio_9p_device_unrealize, the memor
On Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020 11:08:59 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020 08:40:20 CET pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
> > From: Pan Nengyuan
> >
> > v->vq forgot to cleanup in virtio_9p_device_unrealize, the memory leak
> > stack is as follow:
> >
> > Direct leak of 14
On Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020 08:40:20 CET pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Pan Nengyuan
>
> v->vq forgot to cleanup in virtio_9p_device_unrealize, the memory leak
> stack is as follow:
>
> Direct leak of 14336 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7f819ae43970 (/lib64/libasan.so.5
From: Pan Nengyuan
v->vq forgot to cleanup in virtio_9p_device_unrealize, the memory leak
stack is as follow:
Direct leak of 14336 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f819ae43970 (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970) ??:?
#1 0x7f819872f49d (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d) ??:?
#2 0x55a