On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:22:47AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Paolo Bonzini writes:
> >
> > > On 12/21/21 13:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > >>> Is this a regression? I suspect commit 5dacda5167 "vl: Enable JSON
> > >>> s
Hi,
> > Simliar: configure stuff not supported by libvirt:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > There will always be a gap between qemu and libvirt, even if most of
> > them are temporary only (while developing a new feature). I think we
> > need some way to deal with this kind of
On 12/22/21 09:22, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
On 12/21/21 13:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Is this a regression? I suspect commit 5dacda5167 "vl: Enable JSON
syntax for -device" (v6.2.0).
Obviously not a
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
> > On 12/21/21 13:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >>> Is this a regression? I suspect commit 5dacda5167 "vl: Enable JSON
> >>> syntax for -device" (v6.2.0).
> >>
> >> Obviously not a regression: everyth
On 2021/12/21 19:26, Markus Armbruster wrote:> Two issues, and only looks
fixable.
>
> -device accepts either a QemuOpts or a JSON argument.
>
> It parses the former with qemu_opts_parse_noisily() into a QemuOpt
> stored in @qemu_device_opts.
>
> It parses the latter with qobject_from_json() in
On 12/21/21 16:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
On 12/21/21 13:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Is this a regression? I suspect commit 5dacda5167 "vl: Enable JSON
syntax for -device" (v6.2.0).
Obviously not a regression: everything that used to work still works.
FWIW I t
On 12/21/21 16:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
On 12/21/21 13:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Is this a regression? I suspect commit 5dacda5167 "vl: Enable JSON
syntax for -device" (v6.2.0).
Obviously not a regression: everything that used to work still works.
FWIW I t
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 12/21/21 13:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Is this a regression? I suspect commit 5dacda5167 "vl: Enable JSON
>>> syntax for -device" (v6.2.0).
>>
>> Obviously not a regression: everything that used to work still works.
>
> FWIW I think -set should be deprecated. I
On 12/21/21 13:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Is this a regression? I suspect commit 5dacda5167 "vl: Enable JSON
syntax for -device" (v6.2.0).
Obviously not a regression: everything that used to work still works.
FWIW I think -set should be deprecated. I'm not aware of any
particularly usefu
When using JSON syntax for -device, -set option can not find device
specified in JSON by id field. The following commandline is an example:
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -device '{"id":"foo"}' -set device.foo.bar=1
qemu-system-x86_64: -set device.foo.bar=1: there is no device "foo" defined
The patch adds
Markus Armbruster writes:
> MkfsSion writes:
>
>> When using JSON syntax for -device, -set option can not find device
>> specified in JSON by id field. The following commandline is an example:
>>
>> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -device '{"id":"foo"}' -set device.foo.bar=1
>> qemu-system-x86_64: -set dev
MkfsSion writes:
> When using JSON syntax for -device, -set option can not find device
> specified in JSON by id field. The following commandline is an example:
>
> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -device '{"id":"foo"}' -set device.foo.bar=1
> qemu-system-x86_64: -set device.foo.bar=1: there is no device "f
12 matches
Mail list logo
