On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 16:39 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:57:51 +0800
> Robert Hoo wrote:
>
> > The original NVDIMM _DSM functions (index 4~6) for label operations
> > have
> > been deprecated by new ACPI methods _LS{I,R,W}[1][2].
> >
> > Patch 1 implements the new
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:57:51 +0800
Robert Hoo wrote:
> The original NVDIMM _DSM functions (index 4~6) for label operations have
> been deprecated by new ACPI methods _LS{I,R,W}[1][2].
>
> Patch 1 implements the new _LS{I,R,W} methods, on top of old _DSM
> implementation.
>
> Patch 2 fixes some
Ping...
On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 14:57 +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> The original NVDIMM _DSM functions (index 4~6) for label operations
> have
> been deprecated by new ACPI methods _LS{I,R,W}[1][2].
>
> Patch 1 implements the new _LS{I,R,W} methods, on top of old _DSM
> implementation.
>
> Patch 2
The original NVDIMM _DSM functions (index 4~6) for label operations have
been deprecated by new ACPI methods _LS{I,R,W}[1][2].
Patch 1 implements the new _LS{I,R,W} methods, on top of old _DSM
implementation.
Patch 2 fixes some typo of logical and/or with bitwise and/or, though
functionally they
The original NVDIMM _DSM functions (index 4~6) for label operations have
been deprecated by new ACPI methods _LS{I,R,W}[1][2].
Patch 1 implements the new _LS{I,R,W} methods, on top of old _DSM
implementation.
Patch 2 fixes some typo of logical and/or with bitwise and/or, though
functionally they
