On 1/16/20 4:05 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> It turns out the /sbin/ldconfig crash is a regression w.r.t from
> stretch->buster so unrelated to these patches. However I've been giving
> them a spin with the linux vdso selftests and stuff is breaking which I
> guess means it's incomplete?
...
> Also fro
On 1/16/20 4:30 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> /x86_64-linux-user/qemu-x86_64
> ~/lsrc/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall_64
> [WARN] failed to find vDSO
> no vsyscall map in /proc/self/maps
> [RUN] test gettimeofday()
> [RUN] test time()
> [RUN] getcpu() on CPU 0
> [RUN]
Richard Henderson writes:
> The x86_64 abi has a legacy vsyscall page. The kernel folk
> have been trying to deprecate this since at least v3.1, but
>
> (1) We don't implement the vdso that replaces vsyscalls,
> (2) As of v5.5, the vsyscall page is still enabled by default.
>
> This lack is af
Richard Henderson writes:
> The x86_64 abi has a legacy vsyscall page. The kernel folk
> have been trying to deprecate this since at least v3.1, but
>
> (1) We don't implement the vdso that replaces vsyscalls,
> (2) As of v5.5, the vsyscall page is still enabled by default.
>
> This lack is af
On 1/15/20 12:14 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> I'll take this series through the linux-user branch except if you prefer
> to do the pull request yourself via another branch (x86 tcg?).
Through the linux-user branch is the right way, I think.
Thanks,
r~
Le 14/01/2020 à 22:09, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> The x86_64 abi has a legacy vsyscall page. The kernel folk
> have been trying to deprecate this since at least v3.1, but
>
> (1) We don't implement the vdso that replaces vsyscalls,
> (2) As of v5.5, the vsyscall page is still enabled by defaul
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:09 PM Richard Henderson
wrote:
[...]
> I vaguely remember someone (Paolo?) implementing something like
> this many years ago, but clearly it never got merged.
That was me back in 2009:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-07/msg00881.html
Glad it will fi
On 14/01/20 22:09, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I vaguely remember someone (Paolo?) implementing something like
> this many years ago, but clearly it never got merged.
Nope, certainly not me.
> In any case, this emulation has been missing for too long.
>
>
> r~
>
>
> Richard Henderson (3):
>
The x86_64 abi has a legacy vsyscall page. The kernel folk
have been trying to deprecate this since at least v3.1, but
(1) We don't implement the vdso that replaces vsyscalls,
(2) As of v5.5, the vsyscall page is still enabled by default.
This lack is affecting Peter's linux-user testing.
The d
