Re: [PATCH 0/3] spapr, spapr_numa: fix max-associativity-domains

2021-01-28 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 1/28/21 6:13 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 1/28/21 6:05 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> >> >> On 1/28/21 1:03 PM, Greg Kurz wrote: >>> On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:17:28 -0300 >>> Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>> Hi, Patches 02 and 03 contain fixes for a problem Cedric found

Re: [PATCH 0/3] spapr, spapr_numa: fix max-associativity-domains

2021-01-28 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 1/28/21 6:05 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > > > On 1/28/21 1:03 PM, Greg Kurz wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:17:28 -0300 >> Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Patches 02 and 03 contain fixes for a problem Cedric found out when >>> booting TCG guests with multiple NUMA n

Re: [PATCH 0/3] spapr, spapr_numa: fix max-associativity-domains

2021-01-28 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza
On 1/28/21 1:03 PM, Greg Kurz wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:17:28 -0300 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: Hi, Patches 02 and 03 contain fixes for a problem Cedric found out when booting TCG guests with multiple NUMA nodes. See patch 03 commit message for more info. This paragraph mentions

Re: [PATCH 0/3] spapr, spapr_numa: fix max-associativity-domains

2021-01-28 Thread Greg Kurz
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:17:28 -0300 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > Hi, > > Patches 02 and 03 contain fixes for a problem Cedric found out when > booting TCG guests with multiple NUMA nodes. See patch 03 commit > message for more info. > This paragraph mentions "TCG guests", but I see nothing

[PATCH 0/3] spapr, spapr_numa: fix max-associativity-domains

2021-01-28 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza
Hi, Patches 02 and 03 contain fixes for a problem Cedric found out when booting TCG guests with multiple NUMA nodes. See patch 03 commit message for more info. First patch is an unrelated cleanup I did while investigating. Daniel Henrique Barboza (3): spapr: move spapr_machine_using_legacy_num