Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/arm vector improvements

2019-11-18 Thread Richard Henderson
On 11/18/19 5:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 05:42, Richard Henderson > wrote: >> >> The first patch has been seen before. >> >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1115039/ >> >> It had a bug and I didn't fix it right away and then forgot. >> Fixed now; I had mixed up the o

Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/arm vector improvements

2019-11-18 Thread Peter Maydell
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 05:42, Richard Henderson wrote: > > The first patch has been seen before. > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1115039/ > > It had a bug and I didn't fix it right away and then forgot. > Fixed now; I had mixed up the operand ordering for aarch32. Since Alex had a nit on

Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/arm vector improvements

2019-10-18 Thread Alex Bennée
Richard Henderson writes: > The first patch has been seen before. > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1115039/ > > It had a bug and I didn't fix it right away and then forgot. > Fixed now; I had mixed up the operand ordering for aarch32. > > The next 3 are something that I noticed while do

Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/arm vector improvements

2019-10-16 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20191017044232.27601-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [PATCH 0/4] target/arm vector improvements Type: series Message-id: 20191017044232.27601-1

[PATCH 0/4] target/arm vector improvements

2019-10-16 Thread Richard Henderson
The first patch has been seen before. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1115039/ It had a bug and I didn't fix it right away and then forgot. Fixed now; I had mixed up the operand ordering for aarch32. The next 3 are something that I noticed while doing other stuff. In particular, pmull is u