Re: [PATCH 0/5] Implement port 92 in south bridges

2024-03-13 Thread Bernhard Beschow
Am 12. März 2024 15:47:21 UTC schrieb "Michael S. Tsirkin" : >On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 02:16:56PM +0100, Bernhard Beschow wrote: >> This series attempts to make QEMU's south bridge families PIIX, ICH9, and VIA >> 82xx more self-contained by integrating IO port 92 like the originals do. > >Bernhar

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Implement port 92 in south bridges

2024-03-12 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 02:16:56PM +0100, Bernhard Beschow wrote: > This series attempts to make QEMU's south bridge families PIIX, ICH9, and VIA > 82xx more self-contained by integrating IO port 92 like the originals do. Bernhard my understanding is that you agreed with Mark this needs more work.

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Implement port 92 in south bridges

2024-02-19 Thread Bernhard Beschow
Am 18. Februar 2024 16:12:30 UTC schrieb BALATON Zoltan : >On Sun, 18 Feb 2024, Bernhard Beschow wrote: >> This series attempts to make QEMU's south bridge families PIIX, ICH9, and VIA >> 82xx more self-contained by integrating IO port 92 like the originals do. >> >> In QEMU, the IO port is cur

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Implement port 92 in south bridges

2024-02-18 Thread BALATON Zoltan
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024, Bernhard Beschow wrote: This series attempts to make QEMU's south bridge families PIIX, ICH9, and VIA 82xx more self-contained by integrating IO port 92 like the originals do. In QEMU, the IO port is currently instantiated as a dedicated device in common PC code. While this

[PATCH 0/5] Implement port 92 in south bridges

2024-02-18 Thread Bernhard Beschow
This series attempts to make QEMU's south bridge families PIIX, ICH9, and VIA 82xx more self-contained by integrating IO port 92 like the originals do. In QEMU, the IO port is currently instantiated as a dedicated device in common PC code. While this works and even results in less code, it seems c