On Fri, Mar 25, 2022, 10:55 AM Eric Blake wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:07:24PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> ...
> > > Yep, as I mentioned, I don't want to see us abandon copyleft either.
> > >
> > > Of course everyone has their own preferred license, so I'm sure
> > > people who write apps
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:07:24PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
...
> > Yep, as I mentioned, I don't want to see us abandon copyleft either.
> >
> > Of course everyone has their own preferred license, so I'm sure
> > people who write apps with MIT, will think we should use MIT
> > too. Ultimately
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:25 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:03:12AM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022, 5:03 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:00:05AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > I've not fully audited
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:03:12AM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022, 5:03 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:00:05AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > I've not fully audited the git history, but what little I've looked
> > > at, the relicensing
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022, 5:03 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:00:05AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:47:48PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 5:08 PM John Snow wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The legacy.py module is heavily
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 02:29:25PM +, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:03:07AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > Overall making it *all* GPLv2+ compat is going to be important if you
> > > want people to be comfortable using it. If it has a mix of GPLv2+
> > > and
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:03:07AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Overall making it *all* GPLv2+ compat is going to be important if you
> > want people to be comfortable using it. If it has a mix of GPLv2+
> > and GPLv2-only code in the source tarball, then the overall combined
> > work will
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:47:48PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 5:08 PM John Snow wrote:
> >
> > The legacy.py module is heavily based on the QMP module by Luiz
> > Capitulino (et al) which is licensed as explicit GPLv2-only. The async
> > QMP package is currently licensed
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:00:05AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:47:48PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 5:08 PM John Snow wrote:
> > >
> > > The legacy.py module is heavily based on the QMP module by Luiz
> > > Capitulino (et al) which is
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 5:08 PM John Snow wrote:
>
> The legacy.py module is heavily based on the QMP module by Luiz
> Capitulino (et al) which is licensed as explicit GPLv2-only. The async
> QMP package is currently licensed similarly, but I intend to relicense
> the async package to the more
The legacy.py module is heavily based on the QMP module by Luiz
Capitulino (et al) which is licensed as explicit GPLv2-only. The async
QMP package is currently licensed similarly, but I intend to relicense
the async package to the more flexible GPLv2+.
In preparation for that change, make the
11 matches
Mail list logo
