On 1/13/24 01:27, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 1/12/24 02:04, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 1/12/24 01:23, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Instead of working on a fixed memory location, allow to index it based
on cpu_index and a given offset (ptr + cpu_index * offset).
Current semantic is not modified as
On 1/12/24 02:04, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 1/12/24 01:23, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Instead of working on a fixed memory location, allow to index it based
on cpu_index and a given offset (ptr + cpu_index * offset).
Current semantic is not modified as we use a 0 offset, thus inline
operation
On 1/12/24 01:23, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Instead of working on a fixed memory location, allow to index it based
on cpu_index and a given offset (ptr + cpu_index * offset).
Current semantic is not modified as we use a 0 offset, thus inline
operation still targets always the same memory location.
Instead of working on a fixed memory location, allow to index it based
on cpu_index and a given offset (ptr + cpu_index * offset).
Current semantic is not modified as we use a 0 offset, thus inline
operation still targets always the same memory location.
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier
---
