On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:39:27PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:57:04 -0300
> Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
> > Greg,
> >
> > This patch is breaking guest startup in ppc-for-5.2 for me. The process
> > gives an almost instant segfault. Here's what I'm doing:
> >
>
> Ok,
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:57:04 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Greg,
>
> This patch is breaking guest startup in ppc-for-5.2 for me. The process
> gives an almost instant segfault. Here's what I'm doing:
>
Ok, this is because this patch should have been applied after
the "spapr: Cleanups
Greg,
This patch is breaking guest startup in ppc-for-5.2 for me. The process
gives an almost instant segfault. Here's what I'm doing:
$ sudo ./qemu-system-ppc64 -machine
pseries-5.1,accel=kvm,usb=off,dump-guest-core=off -m 65536\
-overcommit mem-lock=off -smp 4,sockets=4,cores=1,threads=1 -rtc
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 06:53:58PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> The spapr_phb_realize() function has a local_err variable which
> is used to:
>
> 1) check failures of spapr_irq_findone() and spapr_irq_claim()
>
> 2) prepend extra information to the error message
>
> Recent work from Markus Armbrust
The spapr_phb_realize() function has a local_err variable which
is used to:
1) check failures of spapr_irq_findone() and spapr_irq_claim()
2) prepend extra information to the error message
Recent work from Markus Armbruster highlighted we get better
code when testing the return value of a functi
