On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:02:43PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/26/20 12:36 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:48:22PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Avoid further processing if TRACE_NVME_SUBMIT_COMMAND_RAW is
> >> not enabled.
> >
> > Why?
> >
>
On 6/26/20 12:36 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:48:22PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Avoid further processing if TRACE_NVME_SUBMIT_COMMAND_RAW is
>> not enabled.
>
> Why?
>
> This saves 8 trace events, each with 8 arguments. I guess the intent is
> to improve
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:48:22PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Avoid further processing if TRACE_NVME_SUBMIT_COMMAND_RAW is
> not enabled.
Why?
This saves 8 trace events, each with 8 arguments. I guess the intent is
to improve performance. Did you measure an improvement?
signature.as
Avoid further processing if TRACE_NVME_SUBMIT_COMMAND_RAW is
not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
block/nvme.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c
index eb2f54dd9d..1e5b40f61c 100644
--- a/block/nvme.c
+++ b/block/nvme.c
@@ -367,6