Re: [PATCH 02/22] bsd-user/x86_64/target_arch_cpu.h: int $80 never was a BSD system call on amd64

2022-02-01 Thread Richard Henderson
On 2/1/22 22:14, Warner Losh wrote: Although initial versions of NetBSD did use int $80, it was replaced by syscall before any releases. OpenBSD and FreeBSD always did syscall. Signed-off-by: Warner Losh --- bsd-user/x86_64/target_arch_cpu.h | 58 --- 1 file

Re: [PATCH 02/22] bsd-user/x86_64/target_arch_cpu.h: int $80 never was a BSD system call on amd64

2022-02-01 Thread Kyle Evans
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 5:14 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > Although initial versions of NetBSD did use int $80, it was replaced by > syscall before any releases. OpenBSD and FreeBSD always did syscall. > > Signed-off-by: Warner Losh > --- > bsd-user/x86_64/target_arch_cpu.h | 58

[PATCH 02/22] bsd-user/x86_64/target_arch_cpu.h: int $80 never was a BSD system call on amd64

2022-02-01 Thread Warner Losh
Although initial versions of NetBSD did use int $80, it was replaced by syscall before any releases. OpenBSD and FreeBSD always did syscall. Signed-off-by: Warner Losh --- bsd-user/x86_64/target_arch_cpu.h | 58 --- 1 file changed, 58 deletions(-) diff --git