Peter Maydell writes:
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 06:09, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> I figure the "device becomes real only on realize" thing is actually
>> more myth than thing.
>
> It's not a myth, it's an API guarantee thing. If you don't realize
> the device you create before you use it then yo
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 06:09, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> I figure the "device becomes real only on realize" thing is actually
> more myth than thing.
It's not a myth, it's an API guarantee thing. If you don't realize
the device you create before you use it then you're in the world of
unspecified
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
> On 5/18/20 12:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 06:04, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>
>>> xlnx_dp_init() creates these two devices, but they're never realized.
>>> Affects machine xlnx-zcu102.
>>>
>>> I wonder how this ever worked. If the "devi
Fred Konrad writes:
> Le 5/18/20 à 7:03 AM, Markus Armbruster a écrit :
>> xlnx_dp_init() creates these two devices, but they're never realized.
>> Affects machine xlnx-zcu102.
>>
>> I wonder how this ever worked. If the "device becomes real only on
>> realize" thing actually works, then we've a
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 10:14 PM Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> xlnx_dp_init() creates these two devices, but they're never realized.
> Affects machine xlnx-zcu102.
>
> I wonder how this ever worked. If the "device becomes real only on
> realize" thing actually works, then we've always been missing
On 5/18/20 12:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 06:04, Markus Armbruster wrote:
xlnx_dp_init() creates these two devices, but they're never realized.
Affects machine xlnx-zcu102.
I wonder how this ever worked. If the "device becomes real only on
realize" thing actually works
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 06:04, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> xlnx_dp_init() creates these two devices, but they're never realized.
> Affects machine xlnx-zcu102.
>
> I wonder how this ever worked. If the "device becomes real only on
> realize" thing actually works, then we've always been missing th
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:03:46AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> xlnx_dp_init() creates these two devices, but they're never realized.
> Affects machine xlnx-zcu102.
>
> I wonder how this ever worked. If the "device becomes real only on
> realize" thing actually works, then we've always been
Le 5/18/20 à 7:03 AM, Markus Armbruster a écrit :
xlnx_dp_init() creates these two devices, but they're never realized.
Affects machine xlnx-zcu102.
I wonder how this ever worked. If the "device becomes real only on
realize" thing actually works, then we've always been missing these
two devi
xlnx_dp_init() creates these two devices, but they're never realized.
Affects machine xlnx-zcu102.
I wonder how this ever worked. If the "device becomes real only on
realize" thing actually works, then we've always been missing these
two devices, yet nobody noticed.
Fix by realizing them in xlnx
10 matches
Mail list logo
