On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 4:52 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/12/23 00:56, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:49 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> We're going to change the handling of mvendorid/marchid/mimpid by the
> >> KVM driver. Since these are
On 6/12/23 00:56, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:49 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
We're going to change the handling of mvendorid/marchid/mimpid by the
KVM driver. Since these are always present in all CPUs let's put the
same validation for everyone.
It doesn't make
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:49 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
> We're going to change the handling of mvendorid/marchid/mimpid by the
> KVM driver. Since these are always present in all CPUs let's put the
> same validation for everyone.
>
> It doesn't make sense to allow 'mvendorid' to be
On 6/6/23 10:19, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 04:46:10PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
We're going to change the handling of mvendorid/marchid/mimpid by the
KVM driver. Since these are always present in all CPUs let's put the
same validation for everyone.
It doesn't
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 04:46:10PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> We're going to change the handling of mvendorid/marchid/mimpid by the
> KVM driver. Since these are always present in all CPUs let's put the
> same validation for everyone.
>
> It doesn't make sense to allow 'mvendorid' to
We're going to change the handling of mvendorid/marchid/mimpid by the
KVM driver. Since these are always present in all CPUs let's put the
same validation for everyone.
It doesn't make sense to allow 'mvendorid' to be different than it
is already set in named (vendor) CPUs. Generic (dynamic) CPUs