On 7/13/23 14:10, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
In that case, do you think we should have a check in "realize" to make
sure the backend is 2.0?
Maybe. I think at the moment it would simply not work (with existing drivers)
without terminating QEMU on it due to the misconfiguration. On libvirt level
In that case, do you think we should have a check in "realize" to make
sure the backend is 2.0?
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:08 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/12/23 23:51, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
> > This logic is similar to TPM TIS ISA device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joelle van Dyne
> > ---
>
On 7/12/23 23:51, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
This logic is similar to TPM TIS ISA device.
Signed-off-by: Joelle van Dyne
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 23 ---
hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 28
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --g
This logic is similar to TPM TIS ISA device.
Signed-off-by: Joelle van Dyne
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 23 ---
hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 28
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
