On 12/26/22 10:49, Bin Meng wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 6:04 PM Bin Meng wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:28 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
This will make the code more in line with what the other boards are
doing. We'll also avoid an extra check to machine->kernel_filename since
we
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 6:04 PM Bin Meng wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:28 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
> wrote:
> >
> > This will make the code more in line with what the other boards are
> > doing. We'll also avoid an extra check to machine->kernel_filename since
> > we already checked
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:28 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
> This will make the code more in line with what the other boards are
> doing. We'll also avoid an extra check to machine->kernel_filename since
> we already checked that before executing riscv_load_kernel().
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 4:28 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
> This will make the code more in line with what the other boards are
> doing. We'll also avoid an extra check to machine->kernel_filename since
> we already checked that before executing riscv_load_kernel().
>
> Signed-off-by:
On 21/12/22 19:22, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This will make the code more in line with what the other boards are
doing. We'll also avoid an extra check to machine->kernel_filename since
we already checked that before executing riscv_load_kernel().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
This will make the code more in line with what the other boards are
doing. We'll also avoid an extra check to machine->kernel_filename since
we already checked that before executing riscv_load_kernel().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
---
hw/riscv/spike.c | 31