On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 19:46 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 30/09/20 16:32, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > Compared to Maxim's patch, I am avoiding the extra argument
> > > to do_scsi_device_find by moving the RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD()
> > > out of do_scsi_device_find itself.
> > Which is a good id
On 30/09/20 16:32, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>> Compared to Maxim's patch, I am avoiding the extra argument
>> to do_scsi_device_find by moving the RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD()
>> out of do_scsi_device_find itself.
> Which is a good idea, although my mindset was like, I got a device,
> lets jus
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 13:26 -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Maxim Levitsky
>
> Add scsi_device_get which finds the scsi device
> and takes a reference to it.
>
> Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
> Message-Id: <20200913160259.32145-8-mlevi...@redhat.com>
> Signe
From: Maxim Levitsky
Add scsi_device_get which finds the scsi device
and takes a reference to it.
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
Message-Id: <20200913160259.32145-8-mlevi...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
Compared to Maxim's patch, I am avoid
