On 3/17/23 17:12, Luis Machado wrote:
On 3/17/23 17:07, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 16:55, Luis Machado wrote:
On 3/17/23 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
Having run into this problem in another couple of situations, one of
which involved gdb 10, I think I'm increasingly favouring
On 3/17/23 17:07, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 16:55, Luis Machado wrote:
On 3/17/23 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
Having run into this problem in another couple of situations, one of
which involved gdb 10, I think I'm increasingly favouring option
2 here. The affected gdbs seem t
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 16:55, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 3/17/23 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Having run into this problem in another couple of situations, one of
> > which involved gdb 10, I think I'm increasingly favouring option
> > 2 here. The affected gdbs seem to be quite widely deployed, a
On 3/17/23 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 09:51, Luis Machado wrote:
On 3/13/23 11:44, Luis Machado wrote:
On 3/13/23 11:22, Peter Maydell via Gdb wrote:
Luis and I came up with two options:
(1) leave QEMU outputting the pauth xml as-is, and tell people
whose gdb 12 crash
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 09:51, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 3/13/23 11:44, Luis Machado wrote:
> > On 3/13/23 11:22, Peter Maydell via Gdb wrote:
> >> Luis and I came up with two options:
> >>
> >> (1) leave QEMU outputting the pauth xml as-is, and tell people
> >> whose gdb 12 crashes that they should
Hi,
On 3/13/23 11:44, Luis Machado wrote:
On 3/13/23 11:22, Peter Maydell via Gdb wrote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 18:20, Alex Bennée wrote:
(adding some more gdb types to CC)
Fabiano Rosas writes:
Peter Maydell writes:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
You need a very
On 3/13/23 19:21, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 3/13/23 04:44, Luis Machado wrote:
Luis: I think that rather than doing (2) with a QEMU namespace,
we should define a gdb namespace for this. That makes it clear
that this is still a gdb-upstream-sanctioned way of exposing
the pauth registers.
That
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 19:21, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 3/13/23 04:44, Luis Machado wrote:
> >> Luis: I think that rather than doing (2) with a QEMU namespace,
> >> we should define a gdb namespace for this. That makes it clear
> >> that this is still a gdb-upstream-sanctioned way of exposin
On 3/13/23 04:44, Luis Machado wrote:
Luis: I think that rather than doing (2) with a QEMU namespace,
we should define a gdb namespace for this. That makes it clear
that this is still a gdb-upstream-sanctioned way of exposing
the pauth registers.
That should be fine as well, and would work to s
On 3/13/23 11:22, Peter Maydell via Gdb wrote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 18:20, Alex Bennée wrote:
(adding some more gdb types to CC)
Fabiano Rosas writes:
Peter Maydell writes:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth suppor
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 18:20, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>
> (adding some more gdb types to CC)
>
> Fabiano Rosas writes:
>
> > Peter Maydell writes:
> >
> >> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
> >>> your
On 3/10/23 18:07, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 18:00, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
your likely to hit asserts and aborts. Disable pauth for
(adding some more gdb types to CC)
Fabiano Rosas writes:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
>>> your likely to hit asserts and aborts. Disable pauth for now until we
>>>
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 18:00, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> >>
>> >> You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
>> >> your likely to hit asserts and aborts. Disabl
On 3/10/23 09:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
your likely to hit asserts and aborts. Disable pauth for now until we
can properly probe support in gdb.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 18:00, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
> > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >>
> >> You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
> >> your likely to hit asserts and aborts. Disable pauth for now until we
> >> can
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
>> your likely to hit asserts and aborts. Disable pauth for now until we
>> can properly probe support in gdb.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
>
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 10:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
> your likely to hit asserts and aborts. Disable pauth for now until we
> can properly probe support in gdb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
If it makes gdb fall over, then
On 3/10/23 02:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
your likely to hit asserts and aborts. Disable pauth for now until we
can properly probe support in gdb.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
---
tests/tcg/aarch64/Makefile.target | 2 ++
1 file
You need a very new gdb to be able to run with pauth support otherwise
your likely to hit asserts and aborts. Disable pauth for now until we
can properly probe support in gdb.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
---
tests/tcg/aarch64/Makefile.target | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t
20 matches
Mail list logo
