On 7/13/23 14:15, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:49 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
The tpm-tis-device doesn't work for x86_64 but for aarch64.
We have this here in this file:
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("ppi", TPMStateSysBus, state.ppi_enabled, false),
I don't know whether ppi wo
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:49 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
> The tpm-tis-device doesn't work for x86_64 but for aarch64.
>
>
> We have this here in this file:
>
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("ppi", TPMStateSysBus, state.ppi_enabled, false),
>
> I don't know whether ppi would work on aarch64. It needs firm
On 7/12/23 23:51, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
If 'ppi' property is set, then `tpm_ppi_reset` is called on reset
which SEGFAULTs because `tpmppi->buf` is not allocated.
Signed-off-by: Joelle van Dyne
---
hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_
If 'ppi' property is set, then `tpm_ppi_reset` is called on reset
which SEGFAULTs because `tpmppi->buf` is not allocated.
Signed-off-by: Joelle van Dyne
---
hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c
index 45e