On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:21:44 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 05.03.20 15:25, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05.03.20 15:11, Halil Pasic wrote:
> >> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:44:31 +0100
> >> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 25.02.20 15:35, Viktor
On 05.03.20 15:25, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 05.03.20 15:11, Halil Pasic wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:44:31 +0100
>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25.02.20 15:35, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
On 2/25/20 12:56 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Tue, 25
On 05.03.20 15:11, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:44:31 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 25.02.20 15:35, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/25/20 12:56 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:39:40 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:44:31 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 25.02.20 15:35, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/25/20 12:56 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> >> On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:39:40 +0100
> >> David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 24.02.20 16:02, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
On 25.02.20 15:35, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
>
>
> On 2/25/20 12:56 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:39:40 +0100
>> David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>>> On 24.02.20 16:02, Halil Pasic wrote:
We expose loadparm as a r/w machine property, but if loadparm is set by
the
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:35:47 +0100
Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 2/25/20 12:56 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:39:40 +0100
> > David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >
> >> On 24.02.20 16:02, Halil Pasic wrote:
> >>> We expose loadparm as a r/w machine property, but if loadparm is
On 2/25/20 12:56 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:39:40 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 24.02.20 16:02, Halil Pasic wrote:
We expose loadparm as a r/w machine property, but if loadparm is set by
the guest via DIAG 308, we don't update the property. Having a
disconnect
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:39:40 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 24.02.20 16:02, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > We expose loadparm as a r/w machine property, but if loadparm is set by
> > the guest via DIAG 308, we don't update the property. Having a
> > disconnect between the guest view and the QEMU
On 24.02.20 16:02, Halil Pasic wrote:
> We expose loadparm as a r/w machine property, but if loadparm is set by
> the guest via DIAG 308, we don't update the property. Having a
> disconnect between the guest view and the QEMU property is not nice in
> itself, but things get even worse for SCSI,
We expose loadparm as a r/w machine property, but if loadparm is set by
the guest via DIAG 308, we don't update the property. Having a
disconnect between the guest view and the QEMU property is not nice in
itself, but things get even worse for SCSI, where under certain
circumstances (see
10 matches
Mail list logo